If number of bills is any indication, Congressional will for federal sales tax legislation is alive and well. On November 9, 2011, the third of three federal bills that would authorize states to require remote retailers to collect sales taxes on sales to in-state customers was introduced in Congress. The Marketplace Fairness Act (S. 1832), was introduced by a bipartisan group of 10 Senators. If enacted, the bill would give states the option to collect the sales taxes they are owed under current law from out-of-state businesses, rather than rely on consumers to pay those taxes to the state. The law differs from prior iterations by the breadth of bipartisan support and the latitude the bill give states to choose whether or not to collect sales taxes, thereby preserving states’ rights.
Under the Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill decision, retailers are required to collect sales tax in the states where they have a physical presence, while consumers are required to pay use tax on products where sales tax was not collected. The result puts local retailers at a competitive disadvantage because they must collect sales taxes at the point of sale, while out-of-state businesses, including Amazon and other online retailers, in effect give their customers a discount by not collecting sales tax.
The new bill provides two options by which states could collect sales taxes from online and catalog purchases. Using a new, simplified tax system, the bill would authorize the 24-Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Governing Board member states to impose a sales tax collection duty on out-of-state remote retailers. Non-Streamlined members would have the same authority for adopting minimum simplification requirements. For example, a state wishing to exercise this authority would be required to have a single state-level agency administer, collect and audit all sales taxes, including local sales taxes.
The bill also requires the use of a uniform tax base for state and local taxes. States would need to put in place software to help remote sellers identify the applicable rate and must hold remote sellers harmless if they relied on state-provided information. States would also be required to certify qualifying entities that provide approved compliance services to sellers.
Remote sellers under the bill would need to collect using the applicable destination rate, which is the sum of the state rate and the applicable local rate. In intrastate sales, states would be allowed to use origin sourcing under the SSUTA. Sellers with annual gross receipts of $500,000 or less of sales in the preceding year would not be subject to the collection and remittance requirements. The bill would mandate that any local rate changes could only be effective on the first day of the calendar quarter.
With pressure building on lawmakers to do something in a largely stalemated session, this bill offers an opportunity for Congress to demonstrate they are, in fact doing something for business and states. Stay tuned for further developments.
Click on link to read: Shopping Mall Owner Sues Indiana over Amazon Taxes
For questions regarding SALT issues, please contact Meredith Theiss at 720-227-0064 or mtheiss@taxops.com.