Many times companies will simply include all the wages, supplies and contract expenses of their designated R&D Department(s) into their R&D Credit calculation and “be done” with it. And though this might be a good way to estimate or guess the credit possibility from a high-level perspective, it is not a good way to make an accurate claim.
Were improper expenses included? Did substantially all the activities of individuals working in the R&D Department qualify for the Credit according to the tax law justifying such a claim?
Were all the qualifying activities included? Just because the department does not say “R&D” doesn’t mean that qualified activities exist? In order to qualify, the activities must meet the §41 requirements, not what people simply assume R&D to be. Furthermore, besides direct research qualifying, direct supervision and direct support of the research can qualify as well.
Maybe a product development process perspective would identify more or all the qualifying R&D areas. I have had a lot of success working with the IRS to agree to the proper credit amounts based on qualifying all the related activities of a company up to where the product meets its functional and economic requirements.
Furthermore, it is imperative that the company has and retains the technical support the contemporaneous documentation to support any research credit. In fact the documentation should be ready before any examination begins. Taxpayers obtain better results when the technical analysis is complete before the tax return is filed. Not all R&D Credit determinations are created equal – but a proper analysis with the applicable documentation can provide for an accurate and beneficial credit.
